Categories

Pragmatic Capitalism

Capital for Living a More Practical Life

Fiscal policy with bank loans instead of government bonds?

« Back to Previous Page
0

This idea was first proposed by Prof. Richard Werner some years ago. The idea is to for the government to cease all issuing of bonds tradable in the secondary markets, and instead enter into standard loan contracts with specially set up banks to finance their public sector funding. Attached is a slideshow diagram showing how this process would be carried out.

It sounds too good to be true. But could it really work? What would be the drawbacks / consequences with this method of financing?

Marked as spam
Posted by Incognito 7
Posted on 07/06/2017 3:43 AM
86 views
Private answer

The diagram didn’t get attached in the previous post….Here it is and the original presentation see page 80.
https://www.postkeynesian.net/downloads/Werner/RW301012PPT.pdf

Attachments:
    Marked as spam
    Posted by Incognito 7
    Answered on 07/06/2017 3:50 AM
      Private answer

      Actually QE has the same net effect , the general public has more deposits due to government spending of deposits from bond holders and bond holders are reinstated to their previous deposit holding position, so overall the same extra deposit creation.

      Marked as spam
      Posted by Dinero
      Answered on 07/06/2017 10:04 AM
        Private answer

        In the early years of WW2 this was a way of providing the funds so that thousands of private sector businesses and industries could ramp up and create all the necessary materiel of war in a timely manner. The Fed guaranteed all the loans, and as I recall that was the only thing ‘special’ about it.

        https://www.amazon.com/Keep-All-Thoughtful-Men-Economists/dp/1591144914?tag=nakorn-20

        Marked as spam
        Posted by gene kalin
        Answered on 07/06/2017 11:27 AM
          Private answer

          In the early years of WW2 this was a way of providing the funds so that thousands of private sector businesses and industries could ramp up and create all the necessary materiel of war in a timely manner. The Fed guaranteed all the loans, and as I recall that was the only thing ‘special’ about it.

          https://www.amazon.com/Keep-All-Thoughtful-Men-Economists/dp/1591144914?tag=nakorn-20

          Marked as spam
          Posted by gene kalin
          Answered on 07/06/2017 11:27 AM
            Private answer

            I don’t see how this would solve anything. Instead of issuing bonds as net financial assets the banking system would expand its balance sheet to provide deposits. As Dinero said, this is functionally what QE is doing. Instead of issuing Bonds the Fed is taking the bonds out of the private sector and replacing them with deposits. It doesn’t do anything different than just selling the bonds….

            Marked as spam
            Cullen Roche Posted by Cullen Roche
            Answered on 07/06/2017 12:23 PM
              Private answer
              Marked as spam
              Posted by gene kalin
              Answered on 07/06/2017 1:25 PM
                Private answer

                Well, it would get the Primary Dealers out of the equation. They are middlemen and they definitely take a cut.

                We could just as easily allow the Fed to buy Treasuries directly too.

                Marked as spam
                Posted by MachineGhost
                Answered on 07/14/2017 7:57 PM
                  « Back to Previous Page