Tom Perkins was on Bloomberg TV yesterday afternoon discussing comments he made in a letter to the editors of the Wall Street Journal over the weekend. In case you missed it, the letter explained how the 1% are a minority group being attacked by the majority. And Perkins made a totally inappropriate comparison with the persecution of the Jews during WW2. Not surprisingly, this set off a firestorm.
I understand the point Perkins was making. But these aren’t the comments that interest me. Instead, I was intrigued by some comments Perkins made in the Bloomberg TV interview. At one point, he discussed how he came from the 99% and declared:
“i am your classical self-made man, if you will.”
I always find comments like this to be a little bizarre. There’s a certain level of egotism in this idea that anyone is a “self made man”. As if they’re Robinson Crusoe alone on an island building everything from nothing only to find themselves later surrounded by swarms of people dying to do business with them and praising their past efforts. Of course, that’s not at all how life works. We are inherently social creatures residing and evolving within an incredibly interconnected world where our future success relies on the past, present and future successes of many.
This is not to say that independent thinking or personal skills do not matter. Far from it! But I would echo the thoughts from the latest letter by Howard Marks on luck and skill:
“a great many things contribute to success. Some are our own doing, while many others are beyond our control. There’s no doubt that hard work, planning and persistence are essential for repeated success…But even the hardest workers and best decision makers among us will fail to succeed consistently without luck.”
Marks goes on to explain the role of chance in our lives. How being born in the USA sets us on a dramatically different path than being born in a third world country. Or how being born at a particular time can bring a person incredible fortune. But this only scratches the surface of this myth of the “self made man”.
You see, in a monetary world, your success relies on millions of other people believing that you have something useful to offer the world. In the aggregate, producers need consumers. And consumers need producers. There are two sides to every economic transaction and no one gets rich on their own. And more importantly, in a highly socialized network like the modern monetary system, the structures that make up for success are ultimately built on the backs of millions of people who contribute to the past, present and future foundations of that system. No one built all of this by themselves.
Tom Perkins is not unique here. He did not build his firm on his own. He was mentored by geniuses, utilized technologies that were developed by both the private sector and public sector and was fortunate enough to have access to the absolute best education in the world. And only THEN was he able to leverage all of this into something great. And don’t get me wrong – I am by no means saying that the success of someone like Tom Perkins is not due to hard work, personal skill and perhaps genius. It’s just that there’s ALWAYS so much more to the macro story than one person’s micro achievements.
The bottom line is – no one is “self made”. And people who use this term are almost certainly trying to perpetuate some sort of self aggrandizing myth that makes them feel more comfortable with what is likely fragile ego masquerading as a heroic white knight.
Latest posts by Cullen Roche (see all)
- Why Would Anyone Buy a Negative Interest Bearing Bond? - 02/11/2016
- Central Banks Didn’t Eat Your Lunch - 02/11/2016
- We’re in Uncharted Waters - 02/11/2016